?

Log in

Quid Est Veritas? [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Quid Est Veritas?

[ about us | about us ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Free Will [Jul. 17th, 2006|12:48 pm]
Quid Est Veritas?

eatflipper
Do we (humans) possess free will? (Evaluate from any perspective: empirical, religious, theoretical....)

And, how do you feel about this?
Link6 comments|discuss

Aristotle Returns (sort of) [Jul. 7th, 2006|12:02 pm]
Quid Est Veritas?

pemberlybudgie

Hopefully the mention of Aristotle won't scare you all away...I know with what fond memories we look back upon the sessions of bashing our brains against the fortress of Ariwaddlemeister, but fear not: all brain bashing is now purely voluntary. 

My question is related to my last essay, in which I argued that Aristotle relied too much on making men good by habit. But among the comments I recieved in response, a question was brought up: is that reliance really an evil (I had assumed that it was)?. So my question is this: is the more virtuous man he who has been habituated to doing good until the good becomes natural, or he who has been forced to reason through and see why good is good, and then exercises his willpower upon that basis and from there does good? A question relating to that is: if a man does do good from habit, is that a bad thing (given that habit does not involve thought) if he has habituated himself through his own reason and willpower?

To start off (ignoring the last question), I'll assert that the second mode is better. I think that it corresponds more accurately with human nature (man being a rational animal), whereas the first is a more animalistic way of making a good product by (unintellectual) repetition. 

Three notes:
1) This may not be the exact question that was raised in the essay, but it's something I've been thinking about. So we really don't need to bring Aristotle into it at all (unless y'all are burning to...)
2) I know, there won't be much discussion until Emma at least (b/c I know she's interested in this topic) is a member...
3) Fie upon whatever cruel Fate dictated that MD be off in the rainforests when we need her here; I need someone to staunchly stick up for the other side (which she probably would) so I (and we) can better work through this...she had better check up and give her thoughts once she gets back from Brazil. 

Oh, and 4): I know this is convoluted. But any answer is great. ^_^

Link4 comments|discuss

Official Post no. 1! [Jun. 29th, 2006|12:33 pm]
Quid Est Veritas?

pemberlybudgie

While I'm blustering about trying to get this thing running and all the people members who should be, I'll post Racho's question: is technology a powerful good or a force of evil?

It seems a simple question, but I think we can get a good deal more out of it than first glance would indicate. 

To start things off, I'll give my view:
Technology is undoubtedly a good, but like many good things it has a double edge. Technology helps us communicate; it improves our lives; it protects us; and it does a multitude of other good things which I'm sure everyone can think of and about which there is no further reason for me to ramble. But what are the drawbacks? Sure, technology has also made the world a more dangerous place (eg nuclear weapons, or even guns), but I am more interested in the human aspect: technology has altered man's perception of war, learning, and life itself. ...Let me explain.

War: we've discussed this a little before, but I'll bring it up again. Before the advent of bombs (and largely even before guns), warfare was a deeply personal affair: combat was hand-to-hand, man-to-man. You practically looked in the eyes of your enemy as you killed him. Enter machine guns, bombs, airplane guns: warfare is no longer about people. You drop the explosive from half a mile up--and never see death clouding the eyes of your enemies. You are not taking human life; you are just dropping a thing which moments later puffs up smoke. Human life is despensable; you are not saving your own life by killing someone else--you are just killing someone else. Multitudes, actually. ...

Learning: technology is "dumbing" down our culture. There was a time when words mattered, when it was important to know how to speak, write, and generally express oneself intelligently. In writing, you only had one chance to get it right, or the whole thing was ruined and you had to start over again. There was no "backspace" function in letter-writing. Now, however, there is no necessity to be able to quickly and intelligently gather your thoughts and present your view. Carelessness is permissible because it is so dangerously easy to remedy. Also, in an age when we need to communicate instantly, it's far to difficult to bother actually spelling a word out: "how r u?" is SO much easier than anything more educated.

But there is another powerful way in which I think that technology is dumbing down the culture: VIDEO GAMES. I know this will strike a sour chord with many of you,but this issue frustrates me to no end and I WILL discuss it. Face it, before the advent of those hideous, mind-numbing contraptions, what were the possible pasttimes? --reading books, taking walks, talking with people. But now the ranks of the modern generations have secluded themselves in a new world: and the tragedy is, it's a world from which nothing is gained. It's this that bothers me more than all else. When you read a book (at least a good one), you come away from it with anything from thoughts of character development to new words (and what can equal the joy of stumbling upon a jewel like "recalcitrant" or "obsequious?"). Granted, some books are more for entertainment than moralizing (I consider Sherlock Holmes, for example, to be my own version of "video games" in that it fits within the "amusement" genre); but even from these something may be gained (eg in Sherlock Holmes I may not come away thinking of the good, but I will at least be having thought processes which may mirror the layout or plot of the stories; and I will have new characters to people my imagination, about which I can think; the point is, *I AM THINKING*). But when you come away from a video game, what have you brought with you? I ask again: What? 
...arrg. Why did I get myself started on this? My spleen is rising, I tell you. It angers me that intelligent people waste their lives in fake battles, or fake housekeeping, or whatever. What do they learn of real courage, or love, or truth or anything? What can be gained from this pseudo-world in which everything is controlled by the person playing the game? Of course, it's fun--it's amusement! Now let us bring flooding down upon us Mr. Vierra's famous breakdown of A-MUSE! As humans, don't we have a *responsibility* to be more than merely amused?

*deep breath* ok. enough on that topic for now. ^_^

In more general terms: we live in a culture which expects everything to be instantaneous. It's a culture of impatience, of incessant bustling about and continuous motion. In short, it's a culture of technology. What with cars, computers, cell phones, radios, and just about anything that will help you to do faster whatever it is that you're doing, our life is lived at a constantly accelerated pace. 
But as we zip past archaic barriers of space and time, are we zipping past our own lives as well? Technology is good, but we must use it well. Is being married to it a responsible use? Have we spent our lives glued to our technological gadgets--at the expense of everything human? 

I will leave it to you to decide. 

Link5 comments|discuss

(no subject) [Jun. 28th, 2006|02:56 pm]
Quid Est Veritas?

pemberlybudgie
testing no. 2. Bear with me, people. And comment if you get here ^_^
Link1 comment|discuss

Quid est blogosphere? [Jun. 28th, 2006|02:34 pm]
Quid Est Veritas?

pemberlybudgie
technology scares me. Nevertheless, here is a test to see what the heck is going on with this thing. ...break out the philosophy, folks. Let the discussion begin.
Link1 comment|discuss

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]